Preprint (20.07.2002)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 23:30:18 GMT
From: redshift0@narod.ru
Organization:
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro,
alt.sciphysics.new-theories
Subject: The Indispensable Accuracy of
the Measuring of an EM-wave's Energy
Key words: Cosmology
theory - stationary model - redshift - tired light - Hubble constant
- - - - - - -
The Calculation of the Indispensable Accuracy of the Measuring
of an EM-wave's Energy
Alex M. Chepick, Nizhni Novgorod
20.07.2002
Abstract
The hypothesis of a "tired light" is
now disclaimed by indirect signs. Within the framework of this hypothesis is
demonstrated, that the energy ε=hH (where h -
Planck constants, H - Hubble
constant ) is a value of energy that is lost by a photon in respect to
one cycle of a lightТs wave, irrespective of a wavelength. Only having
exceeding of the indicated measurement accuracy of energy, it is possible to
demonstrate absence or presence of "tired" light directly in experiment.
But in case of the state Universe it is possible to test this hypothesis by the
obtained exponential dependence between redshift and distance up to a
source.
1. Introducing
In [2, p.487] is given the
definition of the term "redshift", as a wavelength increasing (λ) of a
monochromatic spectrum component of a radiation source in an observer'sа frame of reference as compared with
wavelength (λ0) of this
component in its own frame of reference. Also there are given two facts:
└. Parameter
of redshift z=(λ-λ0)/λ0 does not depend on a wavelength. It
confirms by measurements of Doppler effect and gravitational redshift.
B. A Hubble
Law - approximately linear dependence of a cosmological zc
from distance D up to far galaxies and clusters: zc≈(H/c)D,
where H - so-called
Hubble parameter ( H0 Ц Hubble constant Цis the value of the Hubble
parameter in our time).
Thus, the cosmological лredshift╗
that is considered in this article, is a wavelength increasing (λ) of a monochromatic
spectrum component of a radiation source in a observer'sа frame of reference as compared with
wavelength (λ0) of this
component in its own frame of reference, at which one parameter of shift z=(λ-λ0)/λ0 does not
depends on a wavelength and depends on distance D up to far galaxies and clusters.
The hypothesis of a "tired
light" is the assumption, that in our frame of reference the energy of a
photon should decrease at increasing of covered distance.
Let's consider light, as a wave of an electromagnetic
field (EMF). The wave EMF is a series cyclical transformation of electrical and
magnetic fields one into another. Е Inside
each quarter wave segment between zeroes of fields there is an independent
periodic transferring of electrical energy in magnetic one and back. [3,
item "Electromagnetic oscillations"] In other words, the wave EMF can
be esteemed as cyclical transferring process of one kind energy into another.
The process is exactly cyclical - sequence of events of this process repeats.
For a concreteness we would considering two successive half-of-cycle between
zero points of electrical tension as a cycle of a wave EMF. Here is used the
concept of a wave EMF cycle (it underlines a repetition of an energy
transformation processes, instead ofа a
wave period concept, because this term means interval of time, which one in our
case is not a constant furthermore.
In the article an exponential law for changing energy ofа light is concluded for the Stationary Universe model by virtue of the facts A. and B., whence in turn the hypothesis of a "tired light" and constancy of photon energy loss value on one cycle of a lightТs wave follow.
Then for the Stationary Universe
model from a constancy of photon energy loss value on one cycle of a lightТs
waves the conclusion of exponential law of change of energy of light and facts
└. and ┬. is demonstrated.
2. The light лtires╗ in the Stationary Universe
Let's consider parameter of redshift for a far
object in the Stationary Universe model.
z = (λ-λ0)/λ0 = λ/λ0 Ц1
It does not depend on a wavelength, depends on
distance Rа that light passedаа (due to the facts └. and ┬.), and does not
depend on time and place of light emission (due to the stationarity). Let's
designate this relation as λ/λ0 = F(R). Now we shall place an observer N between
motionless source and motionless receiver. He shall watch a transmitted light
on a wavelength λN, that is
distinguished from λ and λ0 due to dependence of the observed frequency from distance. That is we
shall divide a rayТs path R on two sections: the path from the source to
the observer RNE and path from the observer to the receiver R0Nа ,ааа а(R =RNE +
R0N), also next relation is executedа λN/λE = F (RNE ), λ0/λN = F (R0N).
Thus, the function from the sum of two parameters
is equal to product of functions from these items
F(RNE +R0N)=F(R)=λ /λ0 =(λN/λ0)(λ /λN)= F(RNE) F(R0N)
Such property has the exponent: F(R)= eR/Ch, where Ch - some parameter. We receive:
λ(R) = λ0eR/Ch Ц
dependence of a wavelength
ν(R) = ё/ λ(R)=а ν0e-R/Ch - dependence of a frequency of wave
E(R) = ν(R) h=а E0e-R/Ch - dependence of an photon energy
It should be carry out for
satisfaction of these formulas to the fact ┬. Ch=c/H0
, where аH0=
58 km /(sec∙ Mpc)
- Hubble constant,а soа Ch=17∙109 l.y.
Let's remark, that the energy of a
photon under these formulas should decrease at the increasing of covered
distance. That is, the hypothesis the "tired light" is obtained.
Now we shall put R = λ0 in the formula for energy of a photon. We receive a photon energy loss
value on one cycle of a lightТs wave (for λ0<<Ch, that is practically always):
ε=Eloss(R=λ0)=E0(1-e-R/Ch)=h ν0(1-(1- λ0/Ch))=h ν0 λ0/Ch= hH0
Thus, the value of photon energy
loss on one cycle of a lightТs wave is constant.
3. The calculation of the
value of photon energy loss, if it is constant
Let's show, that for a constant
energy loss on a cycle the facts └. and ┬. are executed.
Let's designate of photon energy
loss value on one cycle of a lightТs wave as ε, energy of a photon after n cycles
- En , νn - frequency, λn - wavelength for En . Then E0 - initial energy of a photon, ν0 -
initial frequency, λ0 - initial wavelength. They are connected among
themselves by formula:
E0= h ∙ ν0 = h ∙ c / λ0 ,ааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа (1)
where h - Planck's constants.
And energy En of a photon after n of cycles, νn -
frequency, λn -
wavelength are connected by the formula:
En= h ∙ νn = h ∙ c / λn= E0 - n ∙ ε аааааааа (2)
Thus, quantity of transformation EMF
cycles for a photon is finite.
The remainder of energy after last
cycle has value smaller than ε. If
thisа remainder is more than 0, it
means, that there is an object EMF, that has no property of a wave. Therefore,
the value of energy E0 divide by ε. At the same time if we suppose,
that the energy of a wave after last cycle is equal to 0, we shall receive,
that last frequency is equal to 0, and last wavelength is equal to perpetuity.
Therefore it is necessary to call a condition of a wave EMF when its energy
becomes equal ε as last cycle. After that the
electromagnetic wave dissolves, disappears as object. From these reasoning
follows, what for a photon with initial energy E0 the
maximum number of cycles Nmax makes expression (E0 - ε)/ ε, or
Nmax+1= E0/ ε а= h ∙ ν0 / εа
ааааааааааа аааааааааааа(3)
For a photon with initial energy E0 ,its
life time Tmax makes
аааааааааааааааа
аааааааааааааааа |
|
Nmax |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tmax = |
Σ tn |
|
(4) |
|
|
||
аааааааааааааааа |
|
n=1 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
where tn is time of n-th cycle EMF.
tn = 1/ νn =
h/ (E0 - n ∙ ε) = (h/ε)/ (Nmax+1 - n)ааааааааааа (5)
ааааааааааа Whence
follows, that the life time of a photon Tmax makes
|
Nmax |
|
Nmax |
|
Nmax |
|
Tmax
= |
Σ tn |
= (h/ε) |
Σ(Nmax+1 - n)-1 |
=а (h/ε) |
Σ n-1 |
(6) |
|
n=1 |
|
n=1 |
|
n=1 |
|
or
Tmax(E0) ≈ (h/ε)(C+ln(Nmax+1)) = (h/ε) (C+ln (E0 / ε))аааа
(7)
where C approximately equal 0.5.
Thus life time of a photon is
finite.
LetТs define, in what time after
radiation Tа the energy of a photon becomes
equal En . For this purpose time Tmax(En) we shall deduct from time Tmax(E0) :
T= Tmax(E0) - Tmax(En) = (h/ε) ln (E0 / En)аааааааааааааа (8)
Having designated energy of a photon
in this moment E(T), we receive the formula
T = (h/ε) ln (E0 / E(T))ааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа (9)
And for expression of the photon
energy as function of time after radiation we receive a formula
E(T) = E0e-Tε / hа аааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа
(10)
By taking into account that distance
covered by a photon during time T is equal in the Stationary Universe R=cT , we
receive the formulas of dependence on distance of energy E(R), frequency
ν(R) аand wavelength λ(R) а:
E(R) =а E0e-Rε /ch
ν(R) = E(R) / h =а ν0e-Rε /chаааааааа
(11)
λ(R) = λ0eRε /ch
Accordingly, the formula of
dependence of redshift from distance looks like
z = (λ- λ0)/ λ0 = eRε /ch -1 а (12)
Thus, the redshift of a frequency spectrum from one source
is identical to all frequencies!а
In the Hubble law V=R ∙ H0 for small distances the speed of object V is considered equal V=z∙c.
Asа for small distances redshift is z = eRε /ch Ц1= Rε /ch, we receive
expression for a Hubble constant :
H0 = ε /hааааааа
аааааааааа ааааааааааааа(13)
а
Thus, the formula of energy loss looks like:
ε = h∙ H0ааааааааааааааа аааааааааааа аааааааааааааааааа(14)
We see, that the lost energy on one
cycle of a wave EMF transformation is proportional to a Hubble constant .
And, by analogy with a Planck
formula for a quantum of light energy E=h∙ν, it is possible to call a constant H0- as Hubble frequency,
and ε Ц as Hubble quantum, Subquantum or Plank-Hubble constant.
For value of a Hubble constantа H0 = 58 kms / (sec Х Mpc) is
received
ε =а 1.2∙ 10-51
kg∙ m2∙ sec-2 = 7.4∙ 10-33
eV
Because of a small value of this
energy it is possible also to call it as a quantum of energy of 2 order.
On 1 meter of vacuum a part of
energy loss of light makes
z=Rε /ch=6∙10-27 а,
That not yet possible for
measurement, therefore till now it is considered that the energy loss in waves
EMF is absent.
Let's write once more the formula
for the life time of a photon with allowance for values of ε
Tmax (E0) =
H-1 (1/2- ln(hH)+ln E0 )аааа аааааааааааааааааааа ааа.
Tmax (ν0) =
H-1 (1/2- ln H+ln ν0 )ааааааааааааааааааааааа (15)
which for light with a 500 nm
wavelength makes approximatelyа 1.33∙1012 years
The energy loss of a photon
practically is proportional to theа
distance covered by it up to valueа
1 billion light years (6 %а
Hubble length).
Frequency ν of a photonа onа
the distance R up to a source depends from initial frequency of a photon ν0 under the
formula:
ν = ν0 e -R/Chааааааааа аааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа ааааааааааа (16)
where Ch = ё/H0= 17∙109 l.y. is
Hubble length ; H0 = 58 kms / (sec Х Mpc) - Hubble constant .
4. Additional reasoning for
a лtired light╗
Why the perpetuum mobile - ideal
cyclical converter of energy is impossible? Energy losses is cause of absence
its "лeternity". Any actual cyclical process ofа the energy transformation is not endless. In
the nature there is no perpetuum mobile, i.e. absolute cyclical transfer of
energy (without waste of energy of that kind, which one is used in cyclical
process). Even nuclear forces weaken with the time, owing to what we
notice a half-life period. аWhy the waves EMF should be
exception? Furthermore, the some sorts of decreasing of waves EMF energy are
known (gravitational redshift, separation of a photon on a parts).
аFrom the fact of existence a cosmological "redshift"
follows, that in our frame of reference a frequency and an energy of a wave EMF
are decreased during the time its traveling .
The energy loss should be
distributed on cycles of the wave. That is, on each cycle there should be an
energy loss. Otherwise, if on adjacent cycles there are not conterminous
sequences of events, it are not cycles.
Let's consider one photon. By virtue
of dualism it is possible to consider, that it has properties of a wave -
frequency, period and wavelength. Its quantum and wave properties are tied by
the Planck formula: E= h ∙ ν, where E is energy of a
photon, ν is its frequency. The frequency is
quantity of cycles inа a unit of time.
Let's remark, that formally the same
quantity of energy is on one cycle of this wave and is not dependent on energy
of a photon. The same quantity of energy is on one cycle of a wave of any
photon, irrespective of its frequency. For this reason the value of energy, lost
by a photon, (on a cycle) also is constant.
5. Conclusions
1.
The
urgency of "tired" light is proved for the Stationary Universe model
and the value of energy loss of a photon on one cycle of a lightТs wave is
constant.
2.
The
formulas for a life time of a photon and dependence of its energy from covered
distance are obtained also.
3.
The
view on Hubble parameter as a frequency is offered.
4.
The
most surprising conclusion is received if to look at the formula of energy loss
from other point of view. Energy ε =hH (where h - Planck's constants, H - the Hubble
constant ) is value of energy losses of a photon on one cycle of a lightТs wave
is not dependent on a wavelength! Therefore, it is a global physical constant!
The Hubble constantа has linked
Macrocosms and microcosms.
5.
The
value of photon energy loss on one cycle of a lightТs wave is obtained. (for
value of a Hubble constantа H = 58 kms /
(sec Х Mpc): ε =
7.4 Х 10-33 eV. The constancy of this loss suggests about
existence of stable particles with mass approximately 10-66 g. It demonstrates importance of
research not only superlarge energies, but also supersmall.
6.
On 1
meter of vacuum a part of energy loss of light makes z =6 Х 10-27, that
not yet possible for measurement, therefore till now it is considered that the
energy loss in waves EMF is absent.
7.
It is
possible to test the hypothesis of the Stationary Universe model by the
obtained relation between redshift and distance up to a source. But for this
purpose it is necessary to receive estimations of distances up to far galaxies
by a way which is not dependent on model by the Universe, or way for concrete
(Stationary) model of the Universe.
8.
Because
of the equal contribution of electrical and magnetic component into energy of a
wave EMF, and that during one cycle there are 4 power transmissions between
electrical and magnetic field, probably it is necessary to consider of energy
loss for each such transformation at ε /4.
The literature:
[1] Physical encyclopedias, Є.1. (╠., Soviet
encyclopedia, 1988.)
[2] Physical encyclopedias, Є.2. (╠., Soviet
encyclopedia, 1990.)
[3] Large Soviet encyclopedias. (╠., 2001.)
[4] L.D.Landau,
E.M.Lifshitz. A field theory. (╠., Science, 1967.)